Higher pumping costs at constant pumping rate
Pumping rate Q |
Total drawdown stotal |
Drawdown increase Δ s (compared with ideal drawdown) |
Proportion of total drawdown caused by well ageing |
Additional pumping capacity (calculated) |
Additional costs p.a. (Pumping rate as indicated & cost of power supply 0.11 €/kWh) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[m³/h] | [m³/s] | [m] | [m] | [m³/h] | [W] | [€] |
30 | 0,0083 | 3,88 | 3,88 | 1,88 | 220 | 211,99 |
45 | 0,0125 | 6,35 | 2,47 | 3,35 | 587 | 565,32 |
60 | 0,0167 | 10,26 | 3,91 | 6,26 | 1462 | 1408,78 |
70 | 0,0194 | 14,16 | 3,90 | 9,51 | 2591 | 2496,68 |
The additional drawdown exceeds 1,8 m at a discharge rate of 30 m3/h. At 40 m3/h it already increases to more than 3m, whereas at 70 m3/h as much as 9,5 m out of the total drawdown of 14,16 m can be assigned to entrance losses due to well ageing.
As the well ages, pore space diminishes and the amount of water which can enter the well decreases. Additional energy has to be supplied to overcome the entrance flow resistance in the gravel pack and in the screen slots. The incrustations grow exponentially and this inevitably leads to surging pumping costs.
The increased production costs due to well entrance losses due to ageing can be calculated anonymously in our interactive form.